Submitted by Lance Bateman on Wed, 10/08/2008 - 23:50.
When approaching married women in many tribal cultures about sex for pleasure, they generally reply with confusion. They don't understand the concept at all. For them, life has a goal, and it includes family, and tribe -- context. In that outlook, sex is a function toward the end of a family, and not something that is done without context for individual pleasure alone.
As a result, tribal women are not obsessed with sex as a means of achieving power like Western women are. In turn, family units are more stable. Marriages stay together. People are united in marriage as they are in community, around a goal. When they turn their back on that goal, and start looking only toward their own pleasure, they become sociopathic or destructive to society, albeit in passive, non-violent ways.
In the West, women are obsessed with sex and orgasm. The majority of sex toys are female-oriented. Women have extramarital relationships at an alarming rate, seeking that hunky knight Hollywood has promised them that will make all their fairy tale dreams come true. Many women marry men who can financially support them but not sexually please them. Their husbands are obligated to fill their material needs, while they find other men to fulfill their sexual needs.
Media that celebrates men getting drunk and fornicating recklessly is condemned as bawdy and low brow (Meatballs, Porky's). Yet media portraying women in the same light is deemed as intellectual and enlightening (Sex in the City). The women portrayed in Sex in the City are not healthy role models. They are cosmopolitan materialists living lives devoid of meaning beyond their next physical gratification: a new pair of shoes, another martini, or their next sexual companion. Women pattern their lives after these television women, because despite knowing that TV is fantasy, they see it as a real setting and want to emulate its success.
A common attitude amongst modern women in the West is that the pill is liberation. The reality is that the pill further subjugates women to men by giving them more incentive to make themselves sexually available to emotionally unavailable men. It is alarming how few women realize this. "Well, I know he doesn't care for me emotionally, but at least I won't be getting pregnant!" How is throwaway sex a moral or a good decision? How does this help women as a gender?
Not surprisingly, the result of this unhealthy behavior is unhappy women who become bitter and fight amongst themselves while voluntarily turning themselves into sex objects. They end up single in their 40s and 50s, then alone for the rest of their lives, having missed out on actual love, family, children and a connection to their community. In the name of freedom, they are isolated.
Feminists champion women like Gerri Santoro. Santoro left an allegedly abusive marriage and proceeded into a sexual relationship with a married man. After becoming pregnant with his child, she became paranoid about her husband and ended up dying to a botched abortion. How is this a role model? What was her rush to enter a sexual relationship with a married man while she was still in an allegedly abusive marriage herself? Were those brief moments of sexual pleasure worth ending up dead on a motel room floor?
This is a complete deconstruction of marriage and the family unit. Once again, we see the materialism and self obsession of the West decaying society and leading to complete moral bankruptcy. With the sex "wagging the dog" and becoming the reason for relationships, instead of a way to strengthen those relationships, the divorce rate has skyrocketed -- as has the rate of those never marrying. Men no longer need to marry to get sexual satisfaction and, given that women are likely to be unfaithful and the courts will award them money in a divorce, men are at a massive disadvantage when they marry.
Our dogma of equality helps create this situation. We think that if a group is equal, it will have no reason to fight, because we see people as being as craven as we fear we are -- if they see money, they'll take it, without thinking through the consequences -- we surmise. Using this negative vision of humanity, we decide to make things equal, and since we can't raise the lower, we lower the higher. So if men are perceived as being stronger and richer, we take it out on them and claim we're empowering women, not realizing that we're lowering the bar for both genders and eliminating the power of some of the best among them.
Men and women are polarizing at an alarming rate. No longer do we live complementary lives, but competetive ones. This is toxic and unhealthy for us all. Women do not choose men based on who will give them the strongest and most intelligent children, they choose men based on how many shiny objects they can purchase them.
With the advances in birth control, more and more women are choosing not to have children in Western culture. Women are choosing to remain single and child free all their lives, so they focus solely on their self obsession. This has created a surplus of men seeking mates, which further strains marriages and families. Men now must fiercely compete to find worthy women to create families with.
Even after marriage and children, the constant Sword of Damocles that their wives can leave them at any moment in their pursuit of pleasure hangs over their heads. This further leads to bitterness and resentment towards women, which then causes women to become more bitter themselves. Women resent men causing men to resent women causing women to resent men, ad infinitum. It is a vicious circle.
The only way to break this cycle is to exit it completely. Let's return to the roots of love, marriage, and family. Let's acknowledge that gluttonous sex is no different than gluttonous eating or any other form of gluttony. It is unhealthy and only leads to problems. Let's love our spouses and children, not obsess over the arbitrary trappings of money. Let's engage in more meaningful activities, so we don't obsess over self gratification such as casual sex. Let's heal and let the West endure. And let's spread the word -- healthy behavior makes us happier than those who chase only their own pleasure.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
The birth rate is dropping
That is a fact. It has been in Western society for quite some time now. The only cultures that have a baby boom going are amongst the poorest nations, or driven by oppressive ideology.
But then again, it isn't just rampant sex that has led to our problems. Marriage under Western law is positively a suicidal move for most people. Women have argued for four decades that marriage is slavery for them. Men are only now beginning to realize that it's pretty much true for them as well. There is nothing attractive about marriage anymore, and merely trying to turn back the clock and pretending that we all live in Pleasantville will do nothing. Begin by reforming the egregous laws surrounding marriage; stop making it a partnership between the couple and the state. Most of all, stop painting marriage as some sort of societal mandate. Getting married because public opinion has put a gun to your head and bullied you into it is just another oppression foisted upon people.
As far as competition is concerned, I have no interest whatsoever in being partnered with someone who eternally has something to prove by competing with me at every turn. You want to argue just for the sake of venting your hot air? Go somewhere else. That isn't being a friend, partner, or spouse. I can compete with the people I work with, thank you.
Personally, I believe that a culture that goes out of it's way to hasten it's own demise doesn't deserve to survive. I will make some popcorn, sit out in the lawn chair, and watch the conflagration.
Hold on...
"Personally, I believe that a culture that goes out of it's way to hasten it's own demise doesn't deserve to survive. I will make some popcorn, sit out in the lawn chair, and watch the conflagration."
Who says you're a part of that culture? Are you indirectly admitting that you deserve to die?
Shallow
Women are shallow because they always have been, it's not a modern phenomenon of women going for the "bad boys" and frat douchebags with a natty ice in their hands. My view is that they go for these guys, get knocked up, then find some male with more feminine characteristics to help raise her child.
Just look on dating websites for what women with children want, and compare that to other women. It's quite an interesting difference. Especially with knocked up 21 year old chicks, because that's when girls want bad boyz the most.
That's why societies like the ancient Greeks and Romans generally approved of men cheating on women while forbidding wives from doing the same, because a Greek/Roman citizen would be fucking a prostitute or slave simply to get his rocks off; women would go and have sex with another citizen, probably for power reasons.
Corrupt.org is too influenced by the thought that society has decayed. It hasn't. Humanity has always been this screwed up, it's just that this modern era is a bit more accepting of human nature, for better and worse. The kali yuga doesn't exist because the previous three ones haven't. We're stuck in a frozen state of human weirdness.
Trying to find a partner for love will never happen, for humans aren't built for it. Maybe once women hit 40 or so they're capable of love, but that's only because that age is for help rearing children once their man is long gone.
Right on Track
In the modern West men and women have both lost track of the value of the family and how it relates to not only their well being, but to the well being of the society as a whole. Materialism and consumerism of all wants and needs have no boundaries in the age in which we find ourselves. People have confused the concept of freedom with that of selfishness. This is not a surprise when the greater goals of a people were to not only see a good life for themselves, but also for their common Folk. Since there is no common Folk that the West recognizes in any Indo-European country, there is only a dog eat dog environment that makes the greater public an easy target for enslavement in every aspect. As we see the government/banks/corporations consolidate even more, we are left on our heels while we pay more for every good and service. Instead of a unified revolution, you will see pockets of anarchy and a lot of bitching/voting for more politicos that will do nothing to move the fat beast from the impending doom of the falling axe.
The real answer in my opinion is a return to the integral culture and values of our Indo-European forefathers. Unassimilate from modern thinking, restore the priciples that evolved before xtianity, redefine what it means to be a man/woman within a family, community, Tribe, and Nation. http://www.wolvesofvinland.org
Context
The article is talking about competion for transient things like self-image, public image and stimulation, all ways to briefly divert ourselves from the lasting, meaningful things in life. This type of sex competition has the same goal as drug use, watching television or playing video games. It is the pursuit of childish modern grownups in a society no longer maintaining its common values.
I wouldn't say competition
I wouldn't say competition is completely negative. It happens in almost all species and probably developed as a selective trait. If there was zero competition the birth rate would almost certainly drop. Where I live there is a surplus of young women due to migration so there is not much competition at all. In fact, it seems to be the other way around with many women complaining they can't find a date/husband.
But...
I would say that while competition can yield postive and preferrable results regarding intillect, physiology, etc., the incentives which lead to competition at present are, to put it bluntly, completely screwed up. Confused people look to what everyone else is doing regardless of their notion of individualism and end up choosing mates solely based on shallow principles like monetary worth.