Submitted by Alex Birch on Thu, 02/07/2008 - 21:19.
There seems to be an inherent fallacy in human psychology that I choose to call "crowd cowardice." Let me explain what I mean by giving you an example. Say you'd one day see one of the smart, respectable people of your community getting beaten up by a group of angry teenagers. Suppose even further that there'd be lots of people standing around, watching it happening without doing anything. What would you do?
People today witness all kinds of problems going on around them without doing anything about it. It's become a trend to watch society fall apart while watching TV and eating popcorn. "Mind your own business" is the universal slogan of the 21st century. It's a disease that's handicapping us and robbing us of our dignity and self-respect as individuals.

Crowd cowardice is cowardice motivated by crowd psychology. This means that people don't act because either they expect someone else to step forward and do anything or simply because they're too afraid to do anything alone. Some people don't even care. Crowd cowardice cripples individuals and seems to strengthen fear when other people become paralyzed as well. It's as if the crowd itself makes it impossible to act on the situation.
I call this phenomenon a disease because it's a breakdown of civil responsibility and courage. The reason to why the crime rates are so high, people act selfishly and trust is record low among community citizens is that we don't see society as a unity anymore, but as a random collection of small atoms, each one living his/her separate life. This is never the case; in a community you depend upon other people doing their part to make things work. Anyone thinking otherwise is in denial.
Crowd cowardice is like a bubble world. It only lasts until someone breaks the illusion, then others follow like ants in a haystack. Run up to a person who's getting beaten up and others will be more prone to help out. Help the old lady across the street and the likeliness of someone doing the same next time will increase. Clean your nearby park from trash and make passers-by notice what you're doing; next time someone else might have cleaned it up.
Crowd cowardice follows the basic paradigm of all crowd psychology: follow the herd. When the crowd has got no leader and no civil courage, it becomes a disorganized mess of people either standing by and waching while their home burns to the ground, or going violently hysterical over whatever moral evil they perceive is a threat to them. You break through this crowd denial by always acting. Don't get swallowed up by cowardice; rise above your crowd inclinations and be the one who puts out the fire first.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Bystander Effect
I've heard this called "The Bystander Effect" and "Diffusion of Responsibility" in other contexts. It's well documented. The Kitty Genovese case in particular is striking. A woman was stabbed to death over the course of about 30 minutes on a New York street in 1964, while seen and heard by an entire complex worth of apartment owners.
Another good justification for localizing our governments.
A step further
How do we categorize those who not only do nothing to help, but video tape the drama?
Well...
I think people's "reality" TV and things like that might contribute to this. Think about it: passively sit on your ass in front of the TV and watch phony dysfuntional family antics, get "voted off" of whatever, bitch and moan every weekday afternoon about which of the 7 men is the father of the future delenquient...
People do the same thing in real life; sit around and watch everyones issues. I think stuff like that though, is partly to blame for making it a spectacle.
Instead of helping the bear attack victim, get it on youtube, great stuff!
Feel free to disagree with me, but I'd honestly feel much safer with a Smith & Wesson. I'd much rather take care of myself than either count on the chance someone else will help me out, or waiting an hour for a cop to come save me from an attacker.