
When not pre-occupied with work, Alfred spends his spare time dressing up as a woman.
by Alfred Wells
I have a problem with being polite to people who I feel are beneath me. I can do it, but it's unpleasant, like taking a shower in your own piss. Being the slick tranny businessman I am, the only time I am nice to people I don't like the look of is when I am about to acquire something valuable of theirs.
But I may be realising the error of my ways. I was at the bar yesterday with a girl from work. Trust me, she is as cold-hearted capitalist as they come: when we are on a project together, she combines my slick tranny-like persona without being an actual tranny; a potent mix. Suddenly, two American girls came over and both heard me cutting glass with my English accent.
One was very attractive, smart, and evocatively dressed. I don't know what the other one looked like because she was ugly. Or what her personality was like for that matter. But one thing was obvious: the great oak tree of genetics hadn't dropped her a completely healthy acorn.
But then something strange happened. My friend was being nice to this girl. She engaged with her, laughed at her par-for-the-course jokes and with some sincerity kept her quite amused. It suddenly dawned on me: what if we were all nice to each other? Not uncritical, nor egalitarian, but rather a kind of permanent cordiality? Jesus spent his whole career being nice, and he got a book written about him - by God!
I often see the comments under these posts (most of the time under Alex's or Sofia's) and I see some people willing to forego courtesy upon having found a moron or someone with a contrary or differing outlook. I'm probably just as guilty. But life is too holy to dismiss someone who has picked up different ideas than you about immigration or capitalism.
If someone just tells me to fuck off I'll be pretty annoyed.
by Alfred Wells
Humanists could get in a frenzy after research shows that people in a vegetative state can communicate just like normal people, except without the talking or moving parts and with a brain scanner attached. "We can't let these people die!" they will say, after such subjects exhibit the bare minimum of what can constitute being truly alive.
If I was in such a situation, I know what I'd be screaming on the inside:
"What's he saying?"
"Kill me. Over and over again."
by Alfred Wells
I was walking down the road the other day with a few friends. We were on the way to the pub. In the course of socialising, we were pretending to grind on each other like so many women in a hip-hop video.
Suddenly, someone who we knew, but on the extreme periphery of our social circle, started looking angry and calling us benders. I told him I wasn't homosexual but actually a transvestite - as if he couldn't already guess by the drag I was wearing! What an idiot.
Anyway, we taunted this guy all the way down the road until we got to the pub. Pretending to kiss each other, rubbing each other, asking him out on dates, complementing his shirt, saying his waxed hair style looks so masculine and so on. Each time the look of incredulity and exasperation on his face stretched and contorted itself even further. People with homophobia have one fear - their homophobia. As this guy (my idol) shows us brilliantly, these guys can be made to look pretty stupid pretty fast.
Even though I am technically just a normal, everyday tranny, I still sometimes get temporary and deep urges to fulfil a deep hole in my body. I think you will all know what hole that is! This usually happens after half a bottle of vodka and a few lines of cocaine.
The other day I was at this pretty cool club, dancing away in my vest (I wasn't in drag this time!). The club was just about to close and my urge for man flesh just had to be tempered. I looked over to the bar and suddenly I saw this huge, muscular mass of blond meat just standing there. He looked Scandinavian. He had his shirt ripped wide open, with his dripping abdomen pulsating in the neon light. The open shirt was a sure sign that he was up for some manly action. Literally no-one else had their shirt completely undone in the entire club. Or even in any club anywhere in the world. No-one does that. He looked so gay and I wanted him.
We at Corrupt are always talking about how you should have positive goals, and how you should always reach for them. And for this goal I wasn't just positive; I was HIV positive! I went up to him and complemented him on his cute chest hairs. He smiled and said thanks. After taking a sip of water, he asked if I was hot, as the club had very little air conditioning. I said yes, to which he said I should take off my shirt as well!
From all this outrageous flirting the next move was pretty plain to see. I reached out and touched his bulging pectoral muscles. Then I got a huge surprise (no not that kind of huge surprise!); he freaked out, pushed me away and then shouted "fag" at me. I felt so disheartened! The night was wasted. Or was it? I went outside to see all of the other ladyboys leaving the club (the place is a popular haunt for the LGBT scene). I went home with one of them and... well you know how the night ends!
I guess the lesson here is yes, if you're straight and have spent your whole night dancing topless in a gay bar, don't be surprised if someone tries it on with you at some point. Being tolerant, I forgave the guy anyway and didn't stay to teach him a lesson. I hope whatever that hunky totem is doing nowadays, he's doing it with an eye out for tolerance and fairness.
by Alfred Wells
His dust fell from the busy London sky,
And arose a proud and frosty man;
Winter's gentleman, frozen to the floor
And in our hearts. His pipe a wooden stump,
His eyes were sprouts and buttons too,
The nose we placed it was of orange hue.
Outside we had to leave him overnight,
Although we could not bear him there to stay;
Puddles of him would warm affection make.
And as we woke we found him torn apart,
Our inquisition took to no avail;
To build is prouder than to wreak and quail.
by Alfred Wells
Amazon (UK): Desert Essence Castile Liquid Soap with Tea Tree Oil.
If you look on the back of your shower gel bottle you'll be bummed in the arse by a giant list of esoteric ingredients. I don't want to cover myself with that crap everyday.
Desert Essence soap has four quite plain ingredients, and as far as I can ween, none of them were invented in an underground laboratory or were initially designed for war crimes: Castile soap (made from olive oil), coconut oil, some more olive oil and tea tree oil. It's organic too, which is lovely.
The soap is very mild, and because it's rich in olive oil it keeps your skin from drying out. I have no idea what the coconut oil does, but the tea tree oil acts as a mild antiseptic whilst "diminishing imperfections" according to the back of the bottle.
Use this for everything: your body and your hair (very good for hair, even if you're a tranny like me!) and even your dishes if you don't want to handle hand-raping detergents. Decant it into another shower bottle for washing yourself otherwise it's a little unwieldy.
This gets an Alfred Wells rating of: FIVE STARS OUT OF FIVE STARS LOL BRILLIANT LOL
by Alfred Wells
A lot of people might think that techno is just the repetitive soundtrack to a pile of turds. I don't dispute that, but there is one exception; the finest Eurodance song ever created (and a personal favourite of Alex's):
This song has a vital lesson for us all:
No no, no no no no, no no no no, no no there's no limits.
But how do we reconcile having no limits with making shit techno? The rapper in this song tells us that people "try to diss me 'cos I sell out". However, he responds with "I'm making techno, and I am proud".
He should be, and quite rightly too. There are no limits. This means that most of the time, people will make hilariously poor Eurodance anthems if you let them. There is no point in trying to stop people doing nothing, or even worse making rubbish crap for most of their time, and for good reason; our growth as a civilisation depends on it entirely.
If we treat our existence as having no limits, and we do whatever makes us feel proud, very infrequently, one of us will stumble across something worthwhile. It was literally thousands and thousands of years, during which mankind only made shitty techno, until Beethoven came along.
Even if we do spend our entire lives being proud but producing only mincing Eurodance, at least we'll have spent our time dancing, having fun and giving everyone around us this message: this is awesome, we're not done yet; there's no limits.
by Alfred Wells
OK, so Christmas has come and gone but we can still prepare you in time for next year. So here are a few tips for ruining your next Secret Santa. For the uninitiated (who are you?), "Secret Santa" is when a group of people agree to put their names in a hat and randomly pick out who they will buy a Christmas gift for, usually with a reasonably restricted price limit. It also leaves a lot of opportunity for some arse to go and ruin it all. Use these tips wisely.
1. Not horrifically bad, but tell everyone individually who your Secret Santa is, making it up each time. If possible, use this information in an exchange so they tell you who their Secret Santa is. Tell this information to the rest of the group one by one.
2. Try to fix the initial raffle so that most people are buying you presents and you aren't buying anyone anything. When you receive your gift for the fifth time, chances are they are about to wise up, so grab the gifts and run off.
3. Target your present for maximum unpleasantness. If you've got a fat girl, buy her a month's gym membership. A girl with a monobrow = tweezers. Someone with a gambling addiction = free bets at the local casino. If you've got no ideas at all, then just buy them a balaclava. No-one will have any use whatsoever for a balaclava, but aside from a brief awkward silence you will most likely get away with it. Then you can grab everyone else's gifts and run off, wearing the balaclava if possible.
4. In the interests of political correctness, always refer to Secret Santa as "Secret Gift Exchange". If there is a Muslim taking part, always make eye contact with him when announcing the name and tell him that you're being especially considerate just for his "special needs". Chances are this will piss either him or everyone else in the group off, but if anyone calls you out, just feign good nature. Consider running off with everyone's gifts.
5. Jokingly tell everyone that your Secret Santa gift will be a turd in a Tupperware box, and when the time comes to exchange gifts give them a turd in a Tupperware box, then run off with the gifts (but leave the turd in a box).
6. Keep telling everyone that you hope no-one poor is buying you your present.
7. Try to exclude homosexuals from the group.
by Alfred Wells
Some people may accuse 2012 of being unrealistic and banal, and therefore unworthy of praise, but those people probably have learning disabilities and should be thrown out of the room before they spoil the movie for everyone else. Happily, my brother isn't differently abled and we watched this film in constant admiration of its audacity; for this film truly is ambitious. It may seem like standard Hollywood fare, but I suspect that in reality it is a playful attempt to wrap as many film industry clichés around a retardedly overblown chase-scene as is cosmically possible, whilst also trying to conceal the exercise from people innocent enough not to realise it.
The film is thus: a handful of generic characters must run, fly, drive and sail away from various natural disasters caused by an end of world scenario that threatens to put mankind into extinction. This accounts for probably 85% of the film.
The rest of the film fleshes out the prosaic characters in thirty mercifully brief seconds and the introduction gives us a threadbare reason for the world ending in the first place. Mayans, neutrinos, planetary alignment, something like that. A thickly-accented Indian guy tells us this at the start. He lifts up a lid in a coal mine and some water is bubbling. Apparently, he says, the water isn't normally bubbling. He isn't heard of for the next two hours, and then suddenly we see him on the phone to another character before he dies in a flood five seconds later. Literally everything is arbitrary.
Then comes the best bit: the relentless fleeing. It's both absurd and sublime as it grows increasingly ridiculous. When the eighteenth escape scene finally finishes you're thinking "that truly was ridiculous that time, they can't possibly top tha- OH MY GOD DID HE JUST FLY A SUBMARINE OVER A VOLCANO?! HOW CAN HE PILOT THAT MILITARY JET THROUGH A COLLAPSING SKYCRAPER WHEN HE HAS ONLY HAD TWO BIPLANE LESSONS WITH A MIDGET FOR A CO-PILOT?!"
With disaster looming fast there is a hasty decision at the end of the film about whether or not to let a few hundred stragglers onto a spacious boat that was reserved for the best of the population - that is to say the richest, and those who were specifically chosen for their supposedly good genetics. You're suddenly aware that this development may actually constitute an ethical subtext, before remembering that the film has been nonchalantly killing off humanity in a variety of inventive ways non-stop for the past two hours, and the post-apocalyptic inclusion of a few hundred serfs must really be quite negligible for the species anyway.
People who look down on other people for eating at McDonalds and listening to bouncy rock music probably won't like this film. The great thing about those people is that you can ignore their opinions and nobody will care. In fact, you will probably be rewarded for it. Which works out just fine; they won't be in the room whilst you and others marvel over and over again at this deliberately ham-fisted Hollywood schlockbuster.
by Alfred Wells
Giles Coren humorously comments on the classless class-war rhetoric of local moron Polly Toynbee:
The next day, in my favourite paper's always-gripping education section (“Down wiv' Eton!”), there was another extract from the book, in which Dave and Polly had joined some state school kids from Brent on a trip to Oxford (I bet the kids were delighted).
The clichés here were more delicious still. Not only did the word “spires” appear twice in the same short extract, but the lawns, bless them, were “manicured”. Except they're not, Polly. They're just mown. Same as everywhere else. You don't have to be rich, or posh, or evil to mow the bloody lawn. They mow the lawn on council estates too. It's you, Polly, and you, Dave, who are trying to present Britain as a cartoonish, divided society to suit your own arrogant, dim-witted, outdated Weltanschauung.
For as long as I can remember, I have always viewed privilege and excellence not with disdain, but with reverence, delighting in its potential opportunity. The fact that some of us have already managed to escape the dirt gives us something manifest to aim for, and perhaps to surpass. This is a viewpoint I hope readers of Corrupt also share.
by Alfred Wells
The Copenhagen climate change summit is both winding down and coming undone, with the entire world wondering: "what can Alfred teach us about global warming?". Well I shall tell you.
I haven't done a single bit of first-hand research, nor have I looked at other people's evidence or arguments. Instead of placing my trust in one, none or both sides of a debate in which zealous combatants of all sides inculcate a strange kind of deeply filial bond to their opinions, what I have done is rely on common sense; that strain of cynical, optimistic and humble logic that always remains untainted from the virulent subject matter at hand.
The way I see it: the world may very well be getting warmer. Or not. It may be getting colder. It's snowing outside - a rare prelude to the Christmas season in England - and our last winter was among the coldest ones on record. It may even be staying the same for a while. However, the climate's various variables surely change at one point of another; I would hazard that the temperature of the Moon has been stable for millions of years now, perhaps as a mutual trade-off for not enjoying a single wheeze of breathable air. Are we contributors to this change? Surely yes, but surely not all of it. We are of course one factor to be considered among many.
The Earth's climate will always be changing, but the crowd remains predictably the same. People love to get whipped up into a frenzy about doomsday scenarios; it makes them feel important. Even more, they love announcing dramatic platitudes or flaunting trivial acts in response to the problem of the day (just check Twitter); this makes them seem selfless, anti-elitist and egalitarian, and thereby makes them popular. These twin tactics have historically always brought lots of empty souls together; look at the G20 protests for example. I guess that every individual there felt both important and popular.
That is why I am cynical about the global warmongering lobby. I would require an incontestable burden of proof before I agree to give away Mt. Everest sized chunks of money to incompetent third-world leaders that promise to use the money to sacrifice their own growth and economy, and to sit around and build solar panels instead. All of that to find out one year later that they were lying all along, thinking it a much better investment to purchase several thousand gold-plated AK47s.
But I recognise that my cynicism may very well be misplaced; in simple terms, we should always be wary that there is no smoke without fire, even if it's a very meek, smouldering kind of conflagration. Yet I remain optimistic in the face of such danger. We know that our behaviour is sometimes no good for the environment, it's just that sometimes it takes us a while to realise it en masse. This is why free-range eggs are now so popular, why CFCs are banned pretty much everywhere, why wind farms are being erected, clean coal technology being developed, why fly-tipping is frowned upon, overpopulation becoming a major issue, and why the old, garishly orange, sky-pollutingly inefficient lights on my high street have been replaced with elegant white-light LEDs.
The Copenhagen talks, if they went the way of its most fervent supporters, would have the entire planet infinitely bound into an awkward, anti-democratic and self-harming agreement over an issue widely contested and highly capricious. If, in the course of global events, we eventually come to a stark, irrefutable conclusion that we are taking an ineffable dump on our planet's well-being, perhaps something similar would be the best course of action. Yet despite the humorous foibles of the crowd, evolution has consistently shown humankind to be highly adaptable, and it is in this process I trust. To choose to regress is a failure to adapt, and signals demise.
I do think action is necessary to reduce our negative impact on the Earth. Crucially, we just need to keep to ourselves and I offer one example in support of that idea. Land situated next to a nature reserve behind my town has been left to fallow indefinitely by the local landowner. Within a couple of years, the result is that a beautiful meadow has sprung up and the riverside edges are now populated by a thicket of adolescent foliage. Playing children, hikers and dog walkers have trod a scenic footpath through the middle, and the local deer can be heard courting in the area during many summer nights. Species once endemic to the area can now spread back.
But more practical action is available; I strongly support research into renewable and environmentally friendly technology, despite being a Copenhagen cynic, but I generally do not believe in coercion. I recognise someone's freedom to happily drive an SUV around the home counties, but I don't recognise their intellect. The relevant motto is John Milton's: "opinion in good men is but knowledge in the making". A skyscraper is about to be erected in London that houses three giant wind turbines at its helm. The energy created is enough to power the entire living complex, and some of the area around it. This kind of action should be encouraged, but the capability to utilise such local solutions would be seriously hampered if we were to tax our pioneers and throw their money elsewhere.
Even with all of the most pious ranting available, we cannot force the world to act on our behalf; Europe's cajoling, China, India, and America's reluctance, and the limpet-like financial demands of third-world states have made talks too volatile to enforce global consensus. Yet unless all of these people are actually psychotic, they will each want what's best for their people, or at least themselves.
So in the wake of the conference's failures, what is my answer? I see no point in presenting an entire manifesto, so here are just a few simple words in a vaguely chronological order: be patient, develop, adapt, praise, share and change.
by Alfred Wells
The story itself confirms what we already know about the Labour Party - a vile socialist party of self-obsessed apparatchiks that relies on the votes of parasites every general election, - what is more interesting here is the truly incisive reporting on show.
Gordon Brown was snubbed by badly injured Afghan veterans when they closed curtains round their beds during a hospital visit and refused to speak to him.
More than half the soldiers being treated at the Selly Oak hospital ward in Birmingham either asked for the curtains to be closed or deliberately avoided the prime minister, according to several of those present.
The soldiers, who have sustained some of the worst injuries seen in Afghanistan, described his visit as “opportunistic” and a “waste of time”.
Furious about equipment shortages and poor compensation for their injuries, one soldier said: “It is almost as if we are the product of an unwanted affair ... he has done nothing for us.”
...
“I met Prince Charles and Sir Richard Dannatt [when they visited Selly Oak]. I have respect for them. Prince Charles spoke to me for two hours. I really didn’t want to speak to Gordon Brown.”
Another soldier, who suffered severe injuries when caught in a mine explosion, left the hospital in an attempt to avoid Brown.
He was angry at the government’s attempt to cut compensation payouts for injured soldiers. He said: “I went outside for a fag but when I came back he was still there. Most of us said we wouldn’t like to see him so we drew our curtains and waited for him to go.
...
Another soldier, who lost his right leg after being caught in a mine blast in Afghanistan, said that more than two-thirds of the 25 soldiers on the ward closed their curtains. He, however, decided to speak to Brown.
“I wanted to find out how the guy’s head worked,” he said. “I was interested in what he had made of his trip to Afghanistan and what he had learnt from it.
“I feel that even if someone is a moron, he should have the opportunity to defend his moronity. [His response] all seemed rather textbook and not from the heart.
“It is quite obvious to anyone that Brown is not concerned, it is almost as if we [the soldiers] are the product of an unwanted affair.
“The straight fact is this: we don’t like the man, he has done nothing for us and continues to kick us in the teeth over equipment and compensation.”
Just a few choice cuts from the article, and congratulations to that soldier for calling the Prime Minister out on his moronity. But don't you wish a newspaper could make it simpler, and just tell us what this whole story means? Oh wait, they have! Look:
The concerns of the wounded soldiers appear to highlight a disconnection between front line troops in Afghanistan and Brown and his government.

by Alfred Wells
I don't want to sound like an apologist for Anglo-Saxons, but one thing I enjoy from the English character is its affinity for absurdism. For the epitome of this cultural strand try watching some Monty Python, or read one of Jeremy Clarkson's superlative-laden articles for The Times newspaper.
Alternatively, spend any amount of time inside a middle-class sixth form college, or any university in England. Enter the common room and around 60% of the students inside will either be talking about faecal matter, or at least contemplating opening a discussion based around it. I well remember my school days. For example:
Guy #1: "I think we should sellotape a turd to the inside of someone's washing machine."
Guy #2: "Poor fellow who would have that done to him. If you seal it inside a zip-lock bag it would protect the clothes."
Guy #1: "It would also keep the turd intact."
Toilet humour: England's greatest cultural export.
by Alfred Wells
Berlin, Germany - As Germany celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall, a free music concert staged by Irish rock-band U2 drew controversy as a section of the capital had to be walled in to separate the crowd from the rest of the city.
For those old enough to remember, the temporary barrier reignited memories of the panic surrounding the sudden erection of the old wall in August 1961.
One of those who were trapped said today: "I had just sat down, next to what looked like a makeshift bandstand. I turned around and suddenly I saw a huge barbed wire cordon going up. Some were trying to make it over to the other side. I turned back around and my worst nightmare was confirmed: U2 were performing and there was no way out."
As the concert continued, thousands could be seen inside the zone trying to escape by climbing the gates and throwing themselves against the razor wire fence.
Families were eventually reunited with teary-eyed loved ones who had managed to become stranded inside the restricted zone overnight.
"It was absolute hell," one man said, continuing: "we thought it couldn't get any worse, but then Jay-Z came on. This was advertised to us all as a free concert; a social paradise for everyone."
"But I guess you really do get what you pay for."
by Alfred Wells
I'm a naturally very creative person, always coming up with ideas. The other day I came up with this brilliant movie concept. I'm planning on phoning up Mel Gibson to see if he would like to produce it. I haven't written a script yet, so please don't steal my idea! Do tell me what you think though.
Title
The Waiting Game
Taglines
"Six men enter. Only six will come out alive."
"When all you can do is wait, impatience can be deadly... boring."
"It's time for you to enter.... The Waiting Room!"
"Wait!"
Plot
As part of top-secret government military-industrial research into waiting techniques, the CIA commissions an experiment to find out just how long a man can wait before he's unwilling to wait any longer. Six socially diverse men sign up for the experiment: a token normal white guy, a gay guy, a guy who could either be Mexican or from the Middle East, a black guy who turns out to be the most intelligent one, and two guys in wheelchairs. They wait for about 90 minutes until they all decide to leave. In a final shocking twist, global warming forces people to vote Democrats in order to save the climate.
Themes
Waiting, waiting rooms, patience, stay, remain, hang around, linger, stop, kill time (informal), pass the time.
by Alfred Wells
This morning, the Channel looked so warm and sparkling that I took my two little girls to the beach. As we walked home, a car came screeching to a halt in front of us, and a pair of men jumped out. Within seconds, they were in a vicious fight with a third man, who had scrambled out of another car.
What to do? Should I drag the children away from the fracas? Should I call for help? Should I intervene? And, if so, on whose side?
Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan, although a well honed orator and a politician of sincerity, is a bit of a weed. If he were to recognise that fact in a situation like this, it would be highly commended. Flight is almost always preferable to fight. Logic should always trump or incorporate the fear of ostensible cowardice.
Personally, I wouldn't ever risk an inch of my skin to intervene in a fight between parties of lowlifes, or if there is a reasonable chance they are both lowlifes. Nor would I bother standing up to most people nowadays over points of principle. My main priority is my survival rather than theirs, so what would I have to gain upon entering a scuffle, if that is indeed my goal? Even if it were to protect a shred of my honour, all it takes is a quick shadow and the flick of a knife to find out what cold concrete tastes like.
Obviously the scenario changes if one clearly recognises the worth of one fighting party over the other. Anyone who has read The Faerie Queene will understand the duty of chivalry we owe to fair maidens in distress. Although I tend to do without all of that chastity shit.
by Alfred Wells
As he recalls his embarrassing time in the debating hall, Alex finds it hard to redeem Western democracy.
Well, I can think of a few unorthodox qualities it possesses, which do relate to the pointless bickering Alex was witness to.
Firstly, the fact nothing gets done in a democracy isn't something to be completely despondent about. Nor is the fact that no-one cares what gets done or whatever anyone else does. Democracy is great at pacifying people into inaction, and they generally try to replace the action with fiercer rhetoric. This is great if you think you know better than 95% of the population - leave me to make my decisions alone, morons!
And it's not only the average citizen who no longer gives a shit in a democracy, it's the higher-ups too. Due to the decisiveness of arbitrary autocracy, be it monarchical or a dictatorship, it's not unreasonable to state that such institutions stick their fingers into private lives without justification from time to time. Worked hard and honestly your whole life and now run your own very successful paper merchant? Well too bad, because you've just been nationalised/been caught committing heresy/been caught sodomising, by the King, Commissar or Führer.
Another Good Thing is that it gives annoying social climbers (i.e. cunts) a distinct and separate avenue where they can much better satiate their sense of self-satisfaction. Thankfully this makes it much easier to avoid them.
So, democracy isn't perfect, but sometimes I don't give a shit - and neither does democracy.
by Alfred Wells
The quote goes something like (and I'm not going to look it up to make sure): "the idiotic talk about people, the average talk about events, the intelligent talk about ideas."
Well I've been noticing some idiot talk lately. Here are a few simple formulas, which you can use to good success in any social situation. Alex and Bhetti will be enacting the scenarios for us. On my first draft the dialogue was a little stilted and not very naturalistic, but I have since tried to make it as genuine as possible.
Technique #1
Alex Birch: "So I was watching TV the other day like I always do, did you happen watch programme X"?
Bhetti Ameen: "No I was praying at that time. What happened?"
Alex: "This guy or girl, N, said something or did something. Then this other guy or girl, P, said something or did something which created trivial tension to be reconciled by the end of the show. I will now explain to you my haphazardly formulated opinion on this unnecessarily witnessed altercation or occurrence, with your assent of course".
Bhetti: "Depending on whether or not your argument is socially inclusive, that does or does not totally make sense to me, but you seem cool so let's talk more about these television programmes."
Technique #2
Bhetti: "Wanna exchange quotes from our favourite films for half an hour"?
Alex: "Yes I do."
Technique #3
Alex: "I got drunk enough to do some stupid crap last night. Want to know more?
Bhetti: "Yes I do."
Please note down your own in the comments section, and if it's worth my time I will include them in a future post like this.
by Alfred Wells
The smell is the worst thing about it (the medicine). I've been sort of up and down in the area above experience. Or where it wouldn't matter if all the evidence left and said nothing more about it. Which might be why it's so hard to write a decent trip report down, if there's nothing to say. It all wasn't there. I remember a lot of things which weren't there.
by Alfred Wells
Negotiations between her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the smaller pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) opened in Berlin a day after voters gave the parties 332 seats, enough for a working majority, in the Bundestag.
Mrs Merkel pledged that the new cabinet would be in place before she greets foreign heads of government when Germany celebrates the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall on November 9.
Guido Westerwelle, the putative Foreign Minister and leader of the FDP, is pushing to deregulate the economy, cut spending and reduce taxes.
Stimulus packages, quantative easing, VAT and interest rates - all of these are useless and any link to a "recovery" is merely correlation. By the way I am slightly tipsy as I write this so if I appear incoherent I apologise.
The fact of the matter is this: people want to be rich. Modern people especially; we all love comfort. Of course we do. People will always seek riches and a better lifestyle for themselves, regardless of whatever the government at the time tries to legislate.
Which is why if you leave people alone, if you leave the economy alone, if you leave everything alone, we all tend to agree on making ourselves as wealthy as possible, in a lovely organic process which organises itself beautifully. In this marvellous way, things will tend to get better by themselves.
So Germany leads the way, again. Although hopefully not like it led the way against Poland in 1939.
by Alfred Wells
Barack Obama today reversed almost a decade of Pentagon strategy in Europe, scrapping plans to deploy key elements of a US missile defence shield.
Instead, he said, a more flexible defence would be introduced, allowing for a more effective response to any threat from Iranian missiles.
Perhaps it is just a coincidence: now that Russia has come to agree that some form of action against Iran is necessary, the missile shield has been scrapped.
Was the shield merely a pawn, the eventual discard of which was always intended to be offered to the Russians, in exchange for implicit support for America's much more important foreign policy towards the Middle East?
by Alfred Wells
I took the train from Kassel to Munich early one weekday morning. I slept at the station, and the night got particularly cold. However I did have a choice of where to sleep. Either I could have stayed at the front of the station on a flat and almost comfortable bench, but possibly find myself periodically molested by wandering tramps and other strange twilight vagrants, or I could have relaxed in perfect solitude along any of the train platforms, on benches that looked like they were designed for enthusiastic masochists. I chose the latter option.
Tired and cold and with a spine bent to the side a little bit I stumbled onto the train with my bulky backpack around my shoulders. On my way down the carriage I clumsily nudged anyone brave or ignorant enough not to remain far behind their armrests. I sat down in front a large, content-looking German lady, who greeted me, heard my imperfect attempt at the language, and I believe she started telling me about where she lives. I wasn't particularly conscious by that time, and I fell asleep as soon as she stopped, waking up to see a mercifully empty seat in front of me. The train station around Munich turned out to be incredibly claustrophobic, especially on a hot day with almost 20kg on your back. I met my friend and we left as soon as possible towards the south, towards Kochel am See; the name implying its position by a lake.
To earnestly detail the entirety of the hike would take far too much time and probably wouldn't be interesting. Basically, we travelled eastwards across mountains and forests from Kochel am See towards Lenggries, another town by a lake, then eastwards again to Tegernsee and Schliersee. It was all very beautiful. At this point, we took a train towards Königsee and spent the rest of our time walking around the area there. We had initially planned our route using Google Earth. This small detachment from reality meant that we hilariously overshot our actual possible accomplishment by around 300%. Whilst we were on the computer, we thought nothing about nonchalantly dragging a straight path directly over every stretch of mountains we found, giving no thought to what the reality on the ground would actually be like.
Hiking through remote parts of alpine Bavaria is simply soul purifying. When the sky isn't falling down, it is a serene mixture of physical exertion, clean blue skies, a largely unmolested natural environment, stunning vistas and an infrequent procession of amiable ramblers passing you by. The locals have dotted the mountains with these pretty wooden adaptations, fashioned from fallen tree trunks, that siphon off emerging water from springs and rivers in various playful ways. As well as being delightful to rest by, they also make it far more convenient to collect water for your bottle. The humble soundtrack of tinkering cowbells from every valley is a welcome sensation. However, if you've never attempted it before, don't convince yourself for a second that hiking isn't incredibly difficult work, despite this pleasant description. At the foot of your first ascent, a distance that looks like it's a mere stone's throw away will actually feel like thirty minutes of carrying a much, much larger stone on your back. Our first mountain ascent was characterised by three minutes or less of hard slogging for every ten minutes or more of recuperation.
Finding places to camp in the mountains is sometimes a problem. Owing to the inherent characteristics of mountains, i.e. their inclination to slope upwards, finding a suitable camping site can be rather difficult. On the rare occasion you do find level ground you will most likely be banging in your tent pegs next to a breezy one hundred metre drop, and attempting to tie your legs to the nearest fir tree. Trying to sleep on any appreciable slope can be a very unsettling experience, in the most lateral sense of the term. Imagine that it's late at night and you've been hiking since early in the morning. Your tent is up, your sleeping mat is rolled out, and then you lay down inside your sleeping bag, realising your exhaustion. After a few seconds you notice a slight willingness for the sleeping bag to inch towards the lower side of your tent, but you dismiss it as unimportant and go to sleep. After an hour of sleep you calmly wake up. Mildly astonished, you perceive that your head must now facing the other way, your knees have come to rest just above your chin, and your hands are helplessly locked in a contortion behind your back, having unconsciously turned 180 degrees during a gradual and unsettling descent towards the bottom corner of your tent. Despite all preventative measures, this exact process will happen several times further during the night.
It is much more preferable to find shelter at an alpine hut instead. A mixture of youth hostel and pub, these wooden structures are placed in the more remote regions of the Alps along the longer hiking routes, to allow the more serious walkers time to travel much deeper and higher into the mountains without having to brace the capricious nightly environment. To stay the night is quite cheap and you sleep on simply designed bunks that you share with other hikers. The bar offers wholesome food and frothy local beer, both of which are much appreciated after a long hike. The local Bavarian community forms around these huts, with the atmosphere inside being superbly warm, in stark contrast to the dark and cold air outside. I stayed twice in two of these dwellings, and the first time I recognised the faces of half a dozen other ramblers who reached the place before me, having seen them on various stages of the mountain beforehand. We had some local beer, and a man played German folk music on his guitar whilst his wife kept in harmony with the lyrics. The second time we slept in a hut my friend and I played chess as a storm raged outside. This close to the scene of the lightning, every time the lightning struck it was like a bomb had been let off. I finished the night with a shot of local spirits, which immediately took me several hundred metres higher up the mountain.
After this second night in a hut we were near the end of our journey. I was initially intending to carry on walking past the hut, towards a more difficult stretch of path that led steeply down the mountain towards the St. Bartholomew church by Königsee. My less confident friend would walk back towards the town. However I had been informed by a Bavarian at a different hut that a lady had fallen and died the day before whilst trying to negotiate the tricky passage, and infrequent crosses inscribed with memorials to dead loved ones confirm the deadly capability of the mountains. He went on to mention that with care there is no need to be worried on the route, but with the skies overcast and the ground still wet from the night before, I decided not to attempt it with the burden on my back, and turned to take the easier path back down towards the north.
When you're down from the mountains, there are many interesting things to tell about civilised Germany too. Like the time I sat down on a bench in Lenggries and came to realise that I was sitting next to a spitting image of Michael Schumacher, who was eating a bread roll at the time. The youth hostels in Germany are actually used by young people in the community as a centre of recreation, but this is quite annoying if you want a place to sleep the night instead of having to pitch your tent in what will come to be an apparently very irritated farmer's field in the morning. I once walked past a school that looked like a concentration camp.
After an extreme night of weather in the mountains, at the heart of which we had pitched our tents, we descended cold and wet towards the town and rented a place at a camping site until the next day. This was where I realised my tent had completely given up the ghost, and for it to cope with just one more meek evening shower was evidently far too much to ask. The roof started to unload drops of water with increasing frequency, and the wonky door proved itself as a highly efficient water chute, the end of which disappointingly sent most of the water inside. I erected an intricate system of water bottles and other camping paraphernalia to correct the canopy into dropping the water harmlessly onto the ground outside, but a brief bluster of wind scattered the instruments and forced me to gather up my possessions like a madman for an undignified rush into my friends tent.
Despite my several mishaps, the overwhelming impression of my time in Bavaria has been that the Bavarians are simply a brilliant people. The rest of Germany has infamously mixed opinions on the area, many being none to keen on the folk. But my blessed experiences with almost every individual I met there have been deeply treasured. An elderly couple on a short hike who, on our first day, noticed we were hopelessly lost without a map, so they gave us theirs and drove us all the way back to our starting point. A man who walked out of his way to take us to the train station, and then patiently showed us a method to purchase cheaper train tickets. A young hiker, stranded on a rainy night at the same train station as us, who gave us a helpful sum of his experience before the storm ended and parted from us with a gift. I'd already forgotten many of the other kind souls even before I returned home, but had I the capacity, I could give an endless and endlessly grateful account of people who offered favours beyond their mere justification, or heard my fractured German requests for directions and were only too pleased to help. Bavaria, along with Austria, has become my favourite European retreat; it's an extraordinary land.
by Alfred Wells
An opinion piece for the UK newspaper The Times condemns the use of the death penalty. Warning: precariously heightened sense of personal virtue ahead.
A botched execution in Ohio should quicken the end of capital punishment.
"Oh no, an idea we don't like for completely insensible moral reasons has shown it doesn't always work perfectly in reality, even though it never claimed to! I have an idea, let's use this as a strawman against the gun-toting Nazis who support capital punishment!"
When the headline says "botched execution" one imagines a grisly, drawn out and painful sort of execution along the lines of the dry-sponge electric chair at the end of The Green Mile. In reality, all that happened in this case is that after two hours they couldn't find a vein strong enough for the lethal injection, so they sent the convicted murderer-rapist away for another week. If no execution took place, how could it be botched?
Their feeble arguments are put forward in the first paragraph.
America is the only big democracy — apart, occasionally, from Japan — that still carries out capital punishment.
America is X, and is also Y. Unfortunately, X + Y does not = Z, where Z is any kind of logical judgement against the use of capital punishment.
The botched attempted execution in Ohio this week of a murderer should prompt America to join the rest of the developed world in consigning judicial killing to history.
Whoops, I've already done this one. Terrible blogging.
There is inadequate evidence that it acts as a deterrent,
Like prison. But use your brain, what one unavoidable aspect of reality has scared the hell out of mankind since time immemorial? That's right, our deaths. Europe's first piece of literature, The Iliad, dealt with overcoming it. Countless other works of art - that form which expresses our human essence - rely on our innate repulsion towards dying. How could death be any less of a deterrent than prison? But the main strength of capital punishment is not its deterrence but rather its protection, by ridding communities of those dangerous and parasitic individuals who threaten any dignified existence.
it ignores the risk of miscarriages of justice
That's a criticism of any failure within the justice system, not the value of the death penalty. Nevertheless, what's to stop us using the death penalty only in cases where there exists undeniable evidence of guilt?
and allows no room for repentance or correction.
Who cares?
But above all it is a barbarity that stains civilised society.
In your timid and haphazardly formulated opinion.
Well that's The Times' main arguments, let's turn to the comments for further hilarity:
PSF London wrote:
Killing a murderer is eye-for-an-eye justice. Surely then it could apply to other crimes such as rape.Who would be appointed to rape the rapist? Would you care to nominate someone?
Why should we listen to the morals of a person who picks a completely illogical non-sequitur out of the thinnest of ethers, to use as an argument against something completely unrelated? Who ever stated that capital punishment is only ever justified due to its "eye-for-an-eye" style? No, it's justified for other reasons, including the ones I have mentioned above. All you've done is to pick out one characteristic that no-one was talking about, and extrapolate that characteristic into a scenario that no-one is talking about.
In fact PSF's comment is so hilarious, I will reproduce the rest of it here. LOL's are in bold:
Why is murder the only crime - that I can think of - which so many claim deserves this biblical form of justice? Is it because they find it easy to wash their hands of a killing which is carried out so clinically by the flick of a switch or a nice and hygienically delivered poison? Surely we could have a clinical way of raping someone in the name of justice?
You always get people on these forums saying "I would gladly pull the trigger". I wonder if they would gladly do the raping in this form of retributive justice.
It is nonsense to say that state sanctioned murder is legitimate. It is barbaric and lazy. We are better than the killers and that means we have to stand firm and live with the consequences of being ethically superior.
"The consequences of being ethically superior" - genius. I guess those consequences are having to put up with more murderers, rapists, paedophiles and sadists than everyone else.
There are about a thousand other arguments put forward in the comment section, but they are mainly about claiming the moral high ground so our egos can inhabit a fake sense of justification, so I won't bother with them.
Anyone with a brain-cell and some testicles can rightfully see that capital punishment is not only justified, but also totally awesome!
by Alfred Wells
Kabul, Afghanistan - The death of Patrick Swayze raises questions over whether democracy could ever take root in the Middle East as millions of Afghans descend into mourning for the late American actor.
Swayze was beloved by millions in Afghanistan, following movie smash-hits such as Red Dawn and Dirty Dancing.
Red Dawn in particular resonated with audiences in the war-torn nation, with its depiction of armed civilian resistance during a fictional Soviet invasion of the USA, at a time when the USSR was still involved in a bitter guerrilla war against the Afghan militia.
But after Swayze's death to pancreatic cancer, many citizens are calling into question the very justification for democracy.
"Swayze gave me hope, he gave us all hope in the eighties. Red Dawn was a masterpiece. Now the man is dead, and democracy didn't save him, so what could democracy ever change for us here?" said Muhammad Talmud, a local shopkeeper.
Avid Bummar, the town's blacksmith, was also dismayed: "I've voted every time so far, but probably won't the next time round. I heard they are doing a remake of Red Dawn, but I don't think it will be as good without Patrick Swayze in it."
The head of the Electoral Complaints Commission, a U.N.-backed body charged with investigating allegations of fraud, expressed confusion over Afghanistan's rather odd reaction to Patrick Swayze's death.
"I have absolutely no idea why so many Afghans are conflating the death of an American actor with any failure of democracy," commission chairman Grant Kippen said. "This is very puzzling."
by Alfred Wells
Kiev, Ukraine - After Elton John was refused adoption of a 14-month old HIV-positive baby on Monday, the Ukrainian agencies have offered him another selection of babies in a new attempt at reconciliation, after he expressed resentment at their decision.
However due to high demand in Ukraine only for young and healthy babies, the new batch of toddlers have all been had to be selected for their varied assortment of crippling diseases. This angered the 62 year old pop-star, who has stated his "disgust" in having to choose between several unhealthy babies.
John said today: "I don't want a baby that will still be bloody dribbling in twenty f***ing years time. They've given me some f***ing downs kids, some polio kids. I said I wanted a kid with HIV, not cancer, not rickets, f***ing aids."
The adoption agency admitted that it had changed its policy to adapt to the singer's request: "We do not believe that Elton would have been a good father figure for a child growing up with HIV, so we've given him other options. After all a baby cannot choose it's parents."
"Maybe if the HIV-positive baby was also homosexual, we might have considered his request," the spokesman said today.
But singer John was not convinced: "This is pure discrimination. They won't give me the aids baby because I don't fit in with their fascist idea of a proper parent. A parent shouldn't have to pick from a bunch of crappy children. I want the HIV one. To be honest, the f***ing kid should be happy with whatever he gets."
In response to his outburst, a spokesman for the UK charity Help the Babies said today: "Elton John is a fat, old, pop-singing poof who only wants to adopt a child to increase his publicity. Anyone who thinks he should be allowed to is alarmingly delirious."
by Alfred Wells
Last week I returned from Germany, having spent a total of three weeks there either hiking or staying with friends. I thought I may as well attempt to interest readers with an account of my journey and some of my observations of the land and its people.
My first week was spent around the border between Hessen and Lower Saxony, which is pretty much in the middle of Germany. I had a few nights at a friend's house in the city of Kassel, before having to move on to get some hiking practice. The region in and around Kassel is heavily associated with the Grimm Brothers; it is there where they grew up together and collected many of their fairy tales, and they would have doubtless gained literary inspiration from their natural surroundings.
Unfortunately you won't at all mind forgetting about Kassel. I've read some of the Grimm fairy tales in the original German, and not at any time did I imagine them taking place inside a budget supermarket or in-between a block of flats inhabited mostly by middle eastern engineering students. You can take a walk anywhere around the town and feel like all you've been doing is negotiating the arcades of a shopping mall. The centrepiece of the town - a simple circle of fountains surrounding an open space - is disappointingly arbitrary, as if a unimaginative ten year old had designed it on Sim City. The only grand-looking area of the city is positioned into irrelevance, perched as it is awkwardly onto the side of the main thoroughfare. The city is not unfriendly, nor especially ugly - it just lacks character.
The city would not be memorable at all were it not for the Bergpark Wilhelmshöhe; Kassel's saving grace and a marvellous showcase of park design where sweeping paths work their way up a small mountain, beginning from a castle on the western edge of the city. The beauty lies in its ability to charmingly lead you from side to side up the slope of the mountain; entering the dense woodland on either flank ambushes your sense of direction before you must turn once again to approach the central garden space from a different angle and a higher elevation. In this way, every crossing of the park offers a new and unexpected revelation of the same landscape below. Secluded pathways, lakes, boulders, rivers and ruins also help provide a sense of childlike adventure on your way up towards the top. A statue of Hercules stands on the very peak, which unfortunately was obscured by repairs at the time of my visit. I chose not to venture back down the way I came after noticing a footpath to the side that pursued an enchanting return route through the adjacent forest.
My next few days were spent around the town of Hannoversch Münden. To walk there from Kassel takes almost a day, but the scenery is pleasant, and the frequent cyclists often give greetings or encouragement. My favourite was a cheerful “gut gewandert!” which would mean something like “well hiked!” in English. Hannoversch Münden is actually somewhat of a hidden gem, a venerable looking town nestled between two stretches of forest in Lower Saxony. At its heart lies an old church around which the local community is focused, and if you head towards the forest in the north you may possibly get to see people mincing around in camp medieval costume due to the fairy tale tradition in the area. I came across one of these surreal parades after having spent several hours walking around in a circle and asking lonely lumberjacks how to get the hell out of there. After that I decided to sit down for a while.
I took a train to the nearby town of Göttingen one day, but didn’t really get much of a chance to see it. The main thing I noticed is that the place is literally full of attractive women. And they all seem to ride bicycles. Either that is a very generous government-sponsored initiative for the benefit of everyone else in the town, or the local cycle dealer has some rather perverse special offers.
Politics is serious business in central Germany. In these sort of towns there is about a 150% chance of seeing an anti-fascism sticker on any given rubbish bin. This means that there will be one relatively new sticker still intact and another, much older sticker that looks as if it has been half scraped away by an outraged neo-Nazi who happened to pass by. I also saw one young boy whose contradicting slogans on his punk attire made him look as if he was hilariously proclaiming his maverick allegiance to the centre-right ground of mainstream politics. “Troops out of Afghanistan! But only after we hand over policing and military control to a peaceful and democratically elected government!”
To end this first part of my adventure, I will mention that it’s nearly election time in Germany, the main clue being the posters up all over the place reminding you what party is prejudiced against whom. The most interesting thing I noticed is that the would-be class warrior has much more choice in Germany than they do here in the UK, as you can see:
Social Democratic Party - “We’ll tax the rich!”
The Left - “We’ll really tax the rich!”
The Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany - “We’ll fucking kill them!”
If you care for more, it’s all about Bavaria in my next piece.
by Alfred Wells
Bucharest, Romania - The day after Madonna controversially went on stage to defend Romania's minority population of Roma gypsies, the famous pop star has staged a press conference in order to apologise for her outspoken remarks, which she says have "deeply humiliated" her.
During her two-hour set, Madonna stopped the music for several minutes in order to patronise the 60,000 strong crowd. Continuing in her violent tirade, she also went on to heavily criticise Romania's traditional opinion of homosexuals, whilst wearing a 'sexed up' First World War-era German military uniform. She has now expressed "profound regret" for her comments.
The singer said: "At the time I didn't know how the crowd could be booing me for what I was saying, because helping minorities is really in fashion at the moment. Several Romanians have since come up to me to explain the situation here. Needless to say the gypsies sound really terrible, a lot like our problem with the Mexicans in the USA, but even worse if that's possible. I guess you really can't picture the impact of different minorities until you see the effects up close and personal."
She continued: "Many Romanians have suffered first-hand at the actions of the gypsies, including at the concert yesterday. I have now learnt to respect people's opinions, and will try hard not make such ignorant comments in the future."
Commenting on the Roma trouble at the concert, Bucharest's local police chief said today: "During the concert, a small wave of cheers could be heard from the rear section of the audience. It is now fully acknowledged that this was actually from the local gypsy minority, who had managed to sneak inside the concert to steal phones and wallets from the distracted spectators."
In response to the controversy, Madonna's troupe of Roma gypsy performers will now be dropped, to be replaced instead by disabled Nigerian Folk Midgets.
by Alfred Wells
I love going to Germany and Austria. Over the years I must have purchased an uncountable number of idiosyncratic beers from local pubs, beer gardens and clubs, and as is the natural way with these murky adventures, I have forgot them all. However there is one German beer I do not yet forget: Krombacher.

As we're now on the second paragraph it's time to warn you that I'm as bad at reviewing beer as I am at soup. To add to this, the last time I tasted Krombacher was last summer and I wasn't really paying attention anyway. As I cannot describe the beer directly, I may simply have to recount my vague experience of the product. The alcoholic context, if you will; an imperfect attempt to judge the cause from its effects. Isn't this the most relevant route to judging a beer's success anyway?
Two crates that lasted about a month, along with several bottles of spirits including Gin and Sambuca. We would drink from our supplies before going out into the night. The first time I tasted Krombacher, what hit me is how so much more fulfilling, and noticeably less harsh it is than the popular brands I'd had in England before. A thick, soft taste - I think. This is a beer that is happy to relax around in your mouth, rather than immediately kick your tongue in the nutsack. It also pairs quite well with spirits, if that's how you like to drink.
The nights themselves were amazing, which is as much a reflection of German lifestyle planning and Gemütlichkeit as the beer. I don't think I ever woke up with a despondent hangover following the Krombacher/Sambuca/Gin combo.
I can recommend this beer, in fact I will hopefully be drinking it tomorrow. If you don't trust my judgement, then just know that it's a very popular beer in Germany; that alone should be qualification enough for it be investigated by beer nerds.
by Alfred Wells
Alex recently reviewed a batch of Hollywood movies for their liberalist qualities. He made a passing mention to American History X, of which I would like to speak further.
The movie has some good points and some bad points. The good points are that it shows racists to mainly be a bunch of low-brow numb nuts, and that the extent of their political activism is to hilariously segregate themselves and their ideas; in reality this is quite accurate. The main bad point is that its honourable attempt at critiquing racist mindsets is terribly done.
The protagonist, who impliedly inherited his racistness from his father, seems to have a little more smarts about him and uses these to organise a skinhead movement around him. They go around shouting "took our jobs!," smashing up grocery stores and then managing to beat black people at basketball, at which point the whole illusion becomes dangerously fragile.
The main white guy gets sent to jail for something or other. Then he gets raped in the showers by some white racists and afterwards makes a non-threatening black mate. He stops being racist after this. So does his younger brother, but he gets shot by a black boy at school, which must have been a little annoying after all of his progress. Maybe he should have worn a SHARP badge or something.
So the moral of the film (I think) is that we need to parachute drop non-threatening blacks into white neighbourhoods to teach the nervous locals that ethnic people are cool too! Then we get some white guys to go around raping to show people that white people can be complete shits sometimes.
Yes, It wouldn't help to note that interaction with different people aids understanding, but when the basic premise of this film, and every other anti-racist film from Hollywood, is to try and tackle the huge and multi-faceted problem of racial tension with the lesson "make an ethnic mate" or "blame white bigotry" without even skimming the surface of ideas or different contexts, the message becomes predictably banal.
by Alfred Wells
A series of allegations including murder, weapons smuggling and the deliberate slaughter of civilians have been levelled against the founder of Blackwater, the security company being investigated for shooting deaths in Iraq.
...
The separate 72-page motion, which cites the affidavits, also accused Blackwater guards of boasting of kills, taking mind-altering drugs, steroids and using child prostitutes.
Sorry, world. Back in the old days we Europeans did pillaging a lot better. Our ancient and closely-knit tribes, including but not limited to the Saxons, Angles, Jutes, Greeks, Celts, Norsemen and Goths would perpetually hone their battle skills by invading their cousins down the road if they were bored, or when it was chilly outside.
Whenever such a skirmish occurred, heroic men with gleaming swords and shields would frighten the local population into a frenzy, indiscriminately tearing up the place beneath the blazing sun. No artillery strikes, no air support, no peace-keeping, no aid missions, just rushing into some faraway land to kill, steal, burn, vandalise and rape, possibly justifying it all with a religion. Then they'd hop into their boats and be back to the hut in time for mead and feasting, perhaps with a bard telling them about how awesome they all were for going out raping all day.
In the midst of this our crusading skills would become ever more adept, and our tenacity ever greater, until the best cultures of Europe turned it into an art form. At this point we quickly got bored of killing each other, so we banded together and started killing foreign people instead. Not only did this turn out to be really easy, but it was also a lot more entertaining. Almost every nation of Europe had its own empire at some point, or at least participated in a few of the Crusades. Even the French! It was also around this time that we stopped raping people after we conquered them; Europe had become politically correct at last.
Back then, money didn't make the world go around; Europeans went around and made the world.
Fast forward to the very end of western civilisation and the only crusaders we have left are a bunch of vulgar, white-trash kiddie-fiddlers, who in any respectable epoch would be impotent soil-dwelling serfs.
I just hope the civilisation that replaces us can deal with these kinds of fools.
by Alfred Wells
I have previously reviewed Heinz's less than satisfactory Chinese Chicken and Sweetcorn soup. I'm pleased to say that their Farmer Market Soup might be better.
To be honest I'm not really sure how good the soup is. The circumstances of this meal were radically different to the Chinese soup. Instead of being in the kitchen with a fully functioning cooker, I was inebriated in a field next to my tent and compromised with a very meek portable gas cooker. There were several others with me.

We'd stumbled in from drinking all night long, and decided we weren't tired yet. Initially we made amused ourselves by setting fire to a quick collection of dry material. Although at first quite a spectacle it went out in mere seconds, and only with hindsight would we come to regret burning all of our toilet paper. Then we tried cooking beer cans, but after we had scolded ourselves with enough simmering alcohol, we found the tin of soup on the floor and decided upon its nourishment.
As avid readers of my blog know, I have successfully prepared ready-made soup before. Using this experience and know-how, I managed to open the can using the ring-pull, and suggested heating it somehow to the others. We found the mild-mannered gas cooker, turned it on, and placed the tin on top.
Due to my expertise I was in charge of stirring the contents of the can every so often and checking its temperature. The flame wasn't very vigorous, so for about 45 minutes we talked about ways one could consume or otherwise use their own faeces in a survival situation. For example: coiling a turd around a mug of tea to keep it warm, or leaving several turds outside of your tent to keep the cannibals away. I think there were around several dozen practical suggestions in all.
The results
We found a fork trodden into the floor and used that, combined with sipping from the tin. All I remember of the soup is that it wasn't overtly bad and the potato chunks were of a good size. The ritual of cooking, sharing and partaking was greatly appreciated by all of us. My personal advice would be to read someone else's blog if you want decent cooking advice.