| Syndicate content

Corrupt

User login

Corrupt Street Wear

Corrupt Street Wear

Delinquent Genes

Submitted by Martin Regnen on Thu, 09/04/2008 - 18:37.

Do you want to blame your antisocial behavior on your lousy genetics? You now have some specific genes to blame it on thanks to a recent study which found that two dopamine receptor genes significantly influence men's chances of developing antisocial behavior. Neither gene has a significant effect by itself but there is a significantly higher risk of antisocial behavior in men who have the A1 allele of the DRD2 gene and the 7R allele of the DRD4 gene. We will probably discover more such gene interactions over the next few years but we already have a small part of the picture. Having the "bad" gene combination does not doom one to a life of crime and behavior problems, though, it only raises the risk in a statistically significant way.

Antisocial behaviorThis is more evidence that the progressive view of humans as blank slates whose life outcomes are determined mainly by their parents and teachers is dead wrong. I don't expect this study to change any progressives' minds, but over time this and other studies demonstrating how specific genes affect human neurology and psychology will eventually reach a critical mass which cannot be denied. Not that I expect progressivism and political correctness to ever give up, but at least I can hope that they will be a little more grounded in reality.

The bad news is that this cause of antisocial behavior does not have a good or easy solution. Gene interactions are tricky - two decent people can have a son with a genetic predisposition to antisocial behavior just because he happens to randomly pick up the wrong alleles from each of the parents. This isn't something which can be prevented by just not breeding with nasty people. We will soon be able to genetically screen parents and/or embryos to prevent boys with this gene combination from coming into the world which would solve the problem.

However, we may not really want to do that - perhaps under some circumstances (when combined with other genes or plain old luck) these genes make men more productive, creative or healthy rather than antisocial? This is something we'll need to find out first. Since we know what these genes are involved in we can perhaps develop drugs which would help combat antisocial behavior in people with this gene interaction, though I doubt many will want to take them voluntarily which opens all sorts of unpleasant scenarios for coercion. That's not much of a solution, either.

There is another piece of bad news in the study. Although the authors try to bury this information by mentioning it in two separate paragraphs and never making the obvious conclusion, the alleles involved are more common in Original men (to avoid offense I am using the term approved by the Nation of Islam) than in American whites or Hispanics. That means that some part of the problems of America's Original community, and perhaps also sub-Saharan Africa, is going to be very difficult to mitigate, and that not all those problems can be traced to differences in IQ averages.

These findings are supported by another study performed by criminologists, though it uses the same data source so it's not entirely independent. Overall the news is pretty depressing - we know that it will be very difficult to do much about at least one of the causes of antisocial behavior. If more studies come out uncovering more gene interactions then the picture will only get darker.

darker or just more solidly based in reality?

I think "darker" here is a relative term. It'll be bad, for example, to get a full genetic makeup like in Gattaca and find out, when one is born, which anti-social/disease-type genes one has. It'll make already neurotic parents even more neurotic to the point where gene choosing is going to become commonplace if this knowledge can be practically applied in today's *current* society.

However, I would hope by the time we really master all of the angles of genes, relationships with other genes, and not only the negatives in the anti-social ones, for example, but the potential positives, society will have changed to a more Corruptian slant. That being the case, we'd be very careful to simply try to breed out genes without realizing what the FULL impact of that would be.

People are all different. We're going to find out that there are billions and billions of gene combinations influencing our behavior, and while it might be worthwhile to try to steer our genes in a more pure/intellection direction, the best way to do that is probably always going to be naturally - organic cultures who breed internally to the group.

Wild vs tame

A word of warning about the "anti social" label. Civilisation has an effect on human evolution. The wilder, more barbarous people do not progress as well as those who are more "civil". Civilisation favours those who quietly get on with their jobs, cooperating with the law, bringing up their families and not rocking the boat. Those who do not fit in with this tend to find themselves excluded from society, either through disapproval or being put in jail. So gradually meeker and more conformist characteristics are favoured.

This being the case, it is to be expected in the present day that there would be a greater proportion of "anti-social" men from parts of the world where civilisation has has less time to tame them - eg Africa. Indeed were it possible to reach back in time and transport a group of ancient Germanic men into our civilisation, it is likely that they would all have a natural dispostion to be "anti-social". Tacitus notes that the ancient Gemanics enjoyed fighting and felt that it was fine to just take what they wanted rather than work for it, for example if a Roman had a sword, gold or anything else they desired. In some ways this is a healthy attitude. Their anti-social nature made them virtually impossible to make into slaves.

Could it be that an attempt to prevent this anti-social gene from spreading could result in a further domestication of humans?

Interesting finds! Also a

Interesting finds!

Also a quick refresh for people: Anti-social behavior does not mean somebody doesn't like to talk to or interact with other people; (that "disorder" is called an avoidant personality) anti-social means a person will make decisions and take actions without any form of regret or guilt for said actions. (for instance: a convicted murderer showing no remorse for his/her homicide)

© 1998-2008 Corrupt.org | Contact | FAQ | Sitemap