by Alex Birch
I've covered before why cardio work out is an overrated method of burning fat. Here's another article confirming this:
To their surprise, the researchers found that none of the groups, including the athletes, experienced “afterburn.” They did not use additional body fat on the day when they exercised. In fact, most of the subjects burned slightly less fat over the 24-hour study period when they exercised than when they did not.
Here's why:
Each of Melanson’s subjects spent 24 quiet hours in the calorimeter, followed later by another 24 hours that included an hourlong bout of stationary bicycling. The cycling was deliberately performed at a relatively easy intensity (about 55 percent of each person’s predetermined aerobic capacity).
Cycling, like much of the traditional cardio exercise programs, really only burns fat during work out session. The problem is that when you've done your running or cycling, you will still want something sugary and you'll still eat more food than usual. This means you gain at least the amount of calories you just burned:
“The message of our work is really simple,” although not agreeable to hear, Melanson said. “It all comes down to energy balance,” or, as you might have guessed, calories in and calories out. People “are only burning 200 or 300 calories” in a typical 30-minute exercise session, Melanson points out. “You replace that with one bottle of Gatorade.”
I noticed the change in metabolism as soon as I began lifting weights at the gym instead of just running or using machines. Commonly my afterburn lasts for 48 hrs, sometimes more. No wonder I eat tons of food and still cannot get enough. And my aim is to remain lean and not put on fat--the guys who just want to get insanely big have to go to McDonald's a few days a week to get by.
“If you work out at an easy intensity, you will burn a higher percentage of fat calories” than if you work out a higher intensity, Carey says, so you should draw down some of the padding you’ve accumulated on the hips or elsewhere — if you don’t replace all of the calories afterward.
This is why all serious fitness models do powerwalks every day: high-intensive training is not enough. You need low-intensive work out to get really lean. Clean the house, work in the garage, chase the kids down the hall etc. However, there's no question that resistance training beats all other popular forms of work out in terms of burning calories. Of course, exercise cannot be separated from diet. Yet, the irony is that many people who light weights end up eating "too healthy," e.g. avoiding all kinds of fatty and high-carb foods. I've been eating fatty sausages these couple of weeks and noticed increased results compared to just eating lean meat and fish. There's apparently room for experimentation.
So, to reiterate: cardio exercise is good for you, but ineffective at burning fat, since you'll simply gain all those calories again after work out. More and more people, especially women, are discovering the power and effectiveness of resistance training. Start lifting weights--it's fun, demanding, and it makes you mentally and physically powerful enough to take on any challenges in life.
I agree with whomever posted
I agree with whomever posted about it being more about doing enough aerobic activity rather than the aerobic activity itself.
Your body burns stored energy in 2 ways. Either it burns glucose for quick energy, or it burns fat with lower intensity aerobic work. If your running at high intensity, your body is built to burn the glucose from the liver first because it simulates running away from predators. If your body doesn't need quick energy, it's going to burn the fat first and save the stored glucose.
And a little fact about weight gaining
Kill me for not remembering who made the research, but it was shown that long cardio workouts reduce the gain in muscle mass, and can even sometimes decrease it. Appearantly our bodies weren't made for lifting heavy things AND running away.
Weightlifting
I've been reading your articles about weightlifting, and last month, I started my workout program. 1+ hours of weights 3-5 days a week, and walking (with 2 German Shepherds) 1 hour 5 days a week. I had been reading your blog along with several other sites about what to do for a workout.
I've noticed the increase in appetite, but not in weight. My weight has stayed the same, but by my clothes, I'm losing weight. Being a woman, I don't have to worry about looking like Arnold Schwartezegger, but I can appreciate muscles on women, I'll appreciate them on myself in a few months too. ;-) I understand that the more muscle I have, the more calories I'll burn when I'm not working out. This is something I should be able to keep up with as I age too. I consider the dog walks my cardio.
I actually signed up for the site so I could leave you a reply...Thank you for writing these articles. You have been a positive influence in my choice of workouts. Please keep the blogs coming.
Speaking as someone who lost 41lbs
You can lose lbs just through cardio, it is the amount of energy you burn to ratio of time. You can do high intensity but you need to prolong the workout. You can lose 10-15lbs a month just walking 4hrs/day everyday per week, and not overeating some might say "thats a lot of time" but it works, I know I did it.
The problem the study shows is not that "exercise doesn't work" it's that people exercise TOO LITTLE, and most people do not rigorously keep track of how much energy the food they are eating contains, that's the big thing I think is that most people don't realize they are over-eating (in the sense of too much energy) vs what they expend, and lets face it most human beings do not keep track of it, I always suggest to people who want to lose weight to track everything they eat for the first few weeks and record the amount of calories in what they are eating using a site like fitday.com.
When I began to keep track of what I was eating thats when I discovered I was eating way too many calories vs my energy expenditure and once you know that, then exercise is effective because you know your energy budget.
re: aerobic exercise
It's definitely not true that it's "ineffective", it's just that aerobic workouts in conjunction with lifting weights burns fat faster. When I was doing both the pounds really started to shed but I lost a good 20-30 lbs with aerobic workouts alone through one spring and summer. Still, it doesn't help your core muscles (cycling actually does, so technically, cycling builds muscle too), and having solid muscle tone is just a good goal to work toward.
Agreed.
Overall, its best to mix it up if you're going for that 'jacked' look, but if you're pressed for time/workouts per week, I wouldnt substitute weights for cardio.