Submitted by Staff on Sat, 04/05/2008 - 18:46.
We received a letter today via MySpace:
Hello,
According to most affiliated with Corrupt, which form of government do you promote?:
Philosopher King/Enlightened Autocrat
Aristocracy
National Socialism
Fascism
Other
I think that most people assume that I support Communism or Anarchy after they see my "End Democracy" sticker, which is absurd as I support several of the above as viable options for governing.
After much reading of the site, it is still unclear as to whether or not there is an "official" Corrupt ideology concerning government.
I look forward to hearing from you,
-Chris
Hi Chris,
We're of the opinion that all of the systems you mention share a fundamental realization: Leadership comes down to ability. This is contrary to democratic "leadership," which essentially says leaders should ask the people before they make any decisions. As we all know, democracies eventually end up being bought up by lobbyists and rich, powerful people who want to sell us things via puppet-politicians on TV.
We support Plato's idea of the philosopher king. A leader needs to combine a philosophical platform and a cultural and spiritual awareness, with the ability to create consensus among people and lead them no matter what. Being a leader is no different than being a mechanic or carpenter, in the sense that we essentially want the right man in the right place. Some people seem to think anyone can perform any task. We've tried that now and it's wrecking our society.
We like the idea of an aristocracy to support an enlightened, specialized elite, hopefully now and then upbringing the kind of people we want to lead our socities. NS, fascism and other meritocratic political systems are rougly supporting the same idea, because they recognized that leadership is something eternal. Democracy and mob rule don't work. Having a financial elite ruling us, like today, only seems to promote rich slaves to power who eventually abuse it and exploit the rest of us.
As we support decentralization, we also like the idea of having one leader for every community, opposed to having a dictator being in charge of a bureaucratic super-state. Corrupt wants to go back to the local, organic collective society. In that sense we share many ideas with anarchists (reduce power we don't need), socialists (create a stable, working system for all citizens), libertarians (reduce government intrusion) and greens (less technology and state, less environmental impact).
Add us to your MySpace profile by visiting our account here.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
| 
"Now however the human race
"Now however the human race has reached a size where these geographical barriers are no longer in place the gene pool should reconverge and eventually the differences in race should disapear since we are the same"
Since we are the same? You mean since we are all human? The implicit differences you readily recognize seem to contradict the notion that we are all the same, please Clarify. Would you like to see the differences in human groups dissapear, why? Would not one humanity require the exact balace of "racial proportion" in order for us all to be the same? For example, An Irishman that breeds with an Phillipino will not produce a child that is racially equivalent to A Jamaican and a Phillipino. Moreover, if the offspring of these two couples were to breed the child would be a Jamaican, Phillipino, Irish trio. Very Different from a Chinese, Norse, Nepalese Child, yet both represent the "convergence of the human gene pool". The idea that we can all mix together and become one human race seems to me absurd, and destructive, as it eliminates the interesting and beautiful races/cultures that exist.
Indeed it is clear that
Indeed it is clear that humans work more productively when with members of the same race, denying that is just more egalitarian propaganda.
Vote
I would have to say National Socialism would be my pick, and no i'm not an angry Nazi picking fights by street corners like which may be stereotyped. I think that we were divided physically by water and mentally by languages for a reason.
Any differences in language
Any differences in language and mentality are simply a result of the physical separation of water and evolution. Geographical separation caused the different groups of early humans to be selected for different qualities via natural selection, while i dont really care what these differences are i do believe they probably exist. Now however the human race has reached a size where these geographical barriers are no longer in place the gene pool should reconverge and eventually the differences in race should disapear since we are the same. This has been observed in other species although another possibility was the route of the red and grey squirreld where the grey squirell was larger and more agressive it has sought to wipe out the red squirrel. Hopefully humans are better than that.