Movies: Fight Club

Fight ClubFight Club is, at first, a dark comedy about an individual lost in modern society. He lives in a condo, eats junk, and has an addiction to buying furniture - because what the hell else is he going to do with his money as a single, well-paid, obedient member of the middle class? He also develops insomnia and looks at the world through a very dark lens: flourescent lights in his office keeping everyone satiated like monkeys in a cage; constant caffeine and junk addiction with piles of trash all around; the false sheen of the world in the form of corporate offices and airports. There are some great one liners early on ("this is your life, and it's ending one minute at a time") and some very clever moves by director David Fincher to make this Chuck Palahniuk novel come to life on the screen. The little we learn of Jack's past seems to paint a picture of a generation, which makes for good metaphor and necessarily complicates Jack's character to make him more interesting.

The real fun, however, begins when our main character meets a fellow business traveler named Tyler Durden. Phase I of this mission of a film is to critique modern society lightly and playfully, while Jack (played wonderfully by Ed Norton) trudges through life and support groups he has no business going to, just so he can "cry and sleep". Phase II is the process of Tyler warming Jack up to the idea that there are more important things in life than lightly poking fun of society even while doing nothing about it, in classic hipster fashion, and asks Jack to do him one simple favor - "I want you to hit me as hard as you can." This blossoms into an underground movement of Jack-a-likes; business men who travel and deal with corporate nothingness all day who simply need to feel something real. Many of these followers, named "space monkeys" in hilarious fashion by Tyler, fall into line and do what they are told because they know that destroying modern society and following a strong leader for a worthy cause is much better than continuing to live with no goals and no leadership. As Tyler says - "we're the middle children of history, men - no purpose or place. We have no great war; no great depression..our great war's a spiritual war; our great depression, is our lives."

While entertaining in its own right, Fight Club ultimately fails to answer a question it can't help but pose to attentive viewers with its nihilistic attitude toward modern society: It's all well and good to destroy a society if people are so helpless that no other method will do (think the wonderful Ra's Al Ghul in Batman Begins) - but what then? The complete picture is outside the scope of the film and these questions are not answered, neither by Chuck Palahniuk (author of the novel), nor by David Fincher (director). It's too bad, because the film seems to almost get there but can't quite make the leap, focusing instead on the main character's ultimate decision to fix his own twisted mind instead of using the immense amount of energy he's built to help rebuild society. This film focuses entirely on the destruction of modern society while taking some fun jabs at it, and for those purposes, it's worth a watch - you'll find yourself rewatching it many times over the course of years, and thinking to yourself on what a society built by Jack and Tyler Durden would look like.

Trackback:

http://www.corrupt.org/trackback/2626

The Narrator's name isn't

The Narrator's name isn't "Jack," it's unknown. He's credited, and should be refered to as the "Narrator".

re: the narrator

you may be right, though it's tempting to think that after reading both the book and watching the movie. remember, he stumbles upon articles "written by an organ in the third person", likely the product of his early days as "Tyler", while blacked out. Tyler told "narrator" he had been in the house for over a year, and that's the timeframe that "narrator" gave Marla when speaking of how long he had been going to the groups. so it's not inconceivable that the "jack" referred to in the journals found in the house later by "narrator" is in fact the narrator, and those entries were written by Tyler.

Actually, Tyler does have a goal in fight club

Although it is easily overlooked.
He is an extreme primitivist. In his view you'd be hunting antilopes down at Seers. He does not crave for great cultural achievements, but for an everyday struggle for survival, where each would do accoding to his abilities, and die if he must.

if that is the goal, isn't

if that is the goal, isn't that just part of the process of evolution? the simple fact remains that if tyler is destroying something that humanity has built, then he feels that humanity can do better. humanity devolving by throwing away all the toys we've built over the past 150 years or more is all well and good, until you figure out that eventually, those toys will be rebuilt or a certain class of people will rediscover them and abuse them in the same fashion they were before. thus, true cultural goals need to be strived for.

FightClub - A surrogate for power?

I am both pleased and surprised to see this article here, as I thought of submitting a review of this myself. I assume that you have read the book too? One of the most important things I believe it emphasizes is how we stock surrogates for what nature itself is supposed to offer us. We were designed to gather and hunt, but no longer have anything to kill, nothing to fight for and nothing to overcome. Thus we have no natural ways to prove our real worth out there either, and istead find ourselves within the mechanistic conception of life, where individuals precisely defined inner structure and nature ceases - and instead breeds our average sleepwalker.

This is why people engange themselves in sports, bodybuilding, boxing and even "fightclubs". I'ts our indirect approach to hierarchy and natural variations, and as you say yourself,: they also need to feel something real. People - or, "the middle children of history" - want to use their lives for something more than just piles of IKEA-furniture. It also shows the lack of insight society has in realizing where this collective boredom and depression - that individuals like Jack are plagued by - springs from, and believes that we can solve everything from depression to insomnia with chemical lobotomy, when what we really lack is goals, feral danger and barriers to cross. Or as Ted Kaczynski would say; a power-process.

"The gyms you go to are crowded with guys trying to look like men, as if being a man means looking the way a sculptor or an art director says."

I agree with the author; How can you truley know yourself if you have never been in a real fight and gone through life without a single scar?

Thank you for posting this. :) I hope people will take a look at it.

Re: Fight Club

Thanks - one of the best things about the book and the movie is that there are so many different angles you can take on the message being sent by the author and the director. Every single line is packed with double meanings, much like The Matrix - I may try to tackle that next :) After ten years, and being able to look back on it with a clear mind, The Matrix falls into the same category of many lines with double meaning with an overall great message.

© 1998-2010 Corrupt.org | FAQ | Sitemap