Why Sweden Hates America

Sweden hates America. But why? Because Sweden regards itself as the most advanced and civilized society in the world. From a Swedish point of view, every country should pass through the same development Sweden has. Of course, that's bullshit. Swedes recognize that when they shift their view to America, the wealthiest nation on the planet, whose political and economic culture is radically different from the Swedish model. Here is a handful of ways in which America's culture pisses Sweden off:

  • Two-party system: Sweden, like most of Europe, is based upon a multi-party system. We have the same range between Left and Right, but in contrast to America, these two political ends are less ideologically conservative and tend to share many policies. Yet, as Brett Steven notes, there is no evidence that America would suffer from more mob-related problems compared to any given multi-party system in Europe. The result: Sweden lacks real democratic alternatives, while America offers a limited but faithful range of political options to vote for.
  • Muscle flexing: America is constantly doing what Sweden regards as a foreign policy fallacy, namely actually daring to enforce international standards abroad. Sweden believes it's a part of those standards, but resembles a handicapped activist, in that it considers belief in ideas more important than acting upon those ideas. Sweden wants peace and democracy in Iraq, yet it regards Bush's war as the most evil thing since Hitler.
  • Anti-socialism: The Swedish model is basically a combination of liberal democracy and socialism. America, in contrast, is a republic constructed to limit the power of both the government and the mob. Yet, despite Sweden's socialist attempts of achieving equality and wealth, America is still doing much better than us, even during a severe recession.
  • Strong private sector: Sweden has focused on building a huge public sector funded by high income taxes, while America still regards private business and free markets as keys to prosperity. I don't think I need to tell you what is most viable in the long run. During the current recession, Sweden is forced to do exactly what Sarah Palin said would happen: declining social and health services combined with a business sector slowly being eroded or exported to the East.
  • True multiculturalism: Sweden consciously lies about its history in order to pretend it's always been multicultural, when the truth is that it's one of the most homogeneous nations on the planet. America, on the other hand, has a long history of different ethnic groups and cultures. And yet, despite not choosing to enforce multiculturalism by government lobbying like in Sweden, America is in general doing better at integrating its immigrants into society than what Sweden is doing with a handful of people from Somalia and Iraq.
  • Patriotism: Americans are proud of their nation. Swedes are proud of their nation, but don't dare to show it in public, lest they in some mysterious way might be interpreted as racist. When Americans walk around and wave American flags on TV, Swedes regard them as fanatic nationalists with guns. When Americans see Swedish flags wave at some government-sponsored event on their TV, they become curious of their cultural roots. An America, despite being patriotic, able to embrace other cultures?
  • Pop culture: Lots of polls show that Swedes regard their country as the most Americanized in all of Europe. Yet a quick glance on what's being played at clubs, televisions and radio stations reveal hard facts: Swedes embrace American Hollywood and pop culture. We like Americanization, we're just too goddamn weak to admit it to a super power.
  • Conservatism: Obama may appear softly socialist in America, but in Sweden he'd be a radical capitalist extremist. Americans embrace religion, creationism, family values, guns, death penalties, tough international laws and local communities. Swedes worship science, liberal humanism, feminism, guns & drugs ban, soft kindergarten prison methods, soft "neutral" foreign policy making and huge suburbs without local culture. In short, America has managed to both become a leading nation and yet conserve traditions, something Sweden never learned to do.
  • Greenist skepticism: The Bush Admin. famously declined joining the climate movement in Europe to meet green emission goals. This infuriates a greenist-crazy Sweden that believes we're all going to melt away unless we cap & trade everything in sight. Al Gore is our hero. In America, to many Americans, he's somewhat of a nut job trying to make money on something else other than party politics. America believes in the environment, but has more belief in capitalism. Sweden has a lot of nature, but not much belief in capitalism.
  • Beauty: On American television you can still see beautiful women on news programs showing themselves off because they are beautiful and successful. On Swedish television you see bitter old middle aged women complaining about the obsession around the female body. Swedes are, like everyone else, interested in fashion, beauty and wealth. They're just held back by a Social Democratic moral that says you shouldn't think you're prettier, smarter or richer than everyone else.

Americans and Swedes, do you recognize yourselves? If so, please shake hands and make up for lost times. We need a united West.

Trackback:

http://www.corrupt.org/trackback/2821

That's a nice Valentine to

That's a nice Valentine to the United States.

(National-)Socialism(humility

(National-)Socialism(humility, Idealism, sharing) can only prevail in a society where the population is culturally and racially homogenous. That is why Sweden gets more liberal each year, that's why America hates socialism.

On Sweden

Your description of Sweden sounds almost exactly like the situation in the United Kingdom, with these exceptions:

- We're involved in the war, but then again the public largely oppose it.
- We do have multiculturalism but integration, where there is any, is based on little more than learning the language and being able to function as some sort of economic unit. Never mind real culture, ministries for 'social cohesion' will prevent race riots!
- People are ashamed of their own flags. Display the Union Jack or St. George's flag and you're supposedly a potential BNP supporter, or just a mere prole who is getting rowdy because the World Cup's on. Whilst the working-class are outside of what Regnen calls "status games", patriotism of any kind is not the pursuit of middle-class status-seeking liberals, except in espousing ideas like "intolerance is un-British!" even though Britain hardly had tolerance on its agenda until progressivism filtered in after World War Two, or so I would argue.

Re: On Sweden

The UK, like the rest of the West, is pursuing passive-aggressive-inferiority-complex-individualistic-moral-relativism, i.e. anything goes for anyone and we can be anything we want, but lets not glorify the best 5% too much because that makes the rest of us feel bad.

I don't mind it so much. In fact, I think it should be the express job of government to make sure pretty much anything can go. What I am a little more concerned about is when a majority of people think anything should go.

I disagree slightly on your view about integration. I've met plenty of seamlessly-integrated persons who were once not of these shores. Multiculturalism is a completely new phenomenon for the UK, so it's no wonder it hasn't gone completely swimmingly to plan.

Furthermore, England hasn't had a "real culture" (by which I mean traditional and formal procedures and aesthetics, rather than our rich output of spectacular artworks esp. literature) for centuries, so it would be surprising to see one pop up unannounced now.

If both Europe and the US get

If both Europe and the US get rid of their present elites, I think it would be a good idea to shake hands. I don´t care about the socialdemocratic mythology about Sweden, but except for small local variations like that, have the same kind of people in power all over the western world.
Anyway, I think they will lose a lot of prestige in the coming years, because the globalist project that they have been supporting will collapse and a process of deglobalisation will begin. (yes I know predictions about the future are difficult, but I´ve been following the cisis carefully, and this is what I believe will happen.)

Deglobalization?

What leads you to suspect this will be forthcoming? It seems... well, it seems quite impossible short of some sort of catastrophe that cripples global communications.

Basically I mean that we will

Basically I mean that we will face the collapse of the american empire and since globalisation can be understood as the expansion of that empire, deglobalisation is the contraction.
There is a 500 trillion $ black hole of derivatives waiting so swallow us all.

Europe/leap 2020 have been right in most of their forecasts so far.

http://www.leap2020.eu/GEAB-N-39-is-available!-Global-systemic-crisis-States-faced-with-three-brutal-options-in-2010-inflation,-high-taxation_a3995.html

They are talking about a "geopolitical dislocation" that will begin soon. I call that geopolitical dislocation deglobalisation.

Besides the point

You're questioning the superiority of America over Sweden. That's a separate issue.

And no, I mean (arguably) the most Americanized:

http://www.engelska.uu.se/research.influence.html
http://svt.se/2.89479/1.1287051/rolf_fredriksson_sverige_ett_av_de_mest_...
http://www.bokus.com/b/9789100110000.html

"Pop culture: Lots of polls

"Pop culture: Lots of polls show that Swedes regard their country as the most Americanized in all of Europe. Yet a quick glance on what's being played at clubs, televisions and radio stations reveal hard facts: Swedes embrace American Hollywood and pop culture. We like Americanization, we're just too goddamn weak to admit it to a super power."

Do you mean "least Americanized?"

I'm also not sure you quite understand how politics in the U.S. works, specifically with regards to how exactly the two parties differ in practice - what actually gets done - as opposed to campaign/TV rhetoric.

The recent (and haphazard) history of U.S. foreign policy has clearly been more a matter of hegemonic posturing than anything else; the fact we don't just come out and say "we want to remain #1 and this is how we're going to do it" also contradicts your assumption that there's an air of national pride throughout the U.S. It just wouldn't sell here at this point, although I'd respect our leaders for being honest, and I'd be more than willing to assess whether perpetual war is necessary to maintain our standard of living if I was asked to. At this point I'm thinking the answer would be no.

I don't doubt that Sweden is slowly defeating itself through its own efficiently green brand of over-socialization, but I'm not sure the U.S. is the best place to look at this point if rugged individualism and like is what you're hoping to see. It's waning on all fronts, and I don't think anything but a collapse will address that issue.

And do you find the Swedish

And do you find the Swedish model inferior? Why? Do you think average Americans enjoy the standard of living most, if not all, ethnic Swedish people have?

© 1998-2010 Corrupt.org | FAQ | Sitemap