It may sound ridiculous, but at this point in time it's true. First Jews kept at home during the leftist-Muslim riot in Malmö during the Davis Cup. Now they're fleeing back to Israel. Sweden weeps anti-racist tears in the press, yet it feels guilt, because it knows it's ultimately responsible for much of the tension.

On the political arena liberals and leftists pretend to be enemies, but they always choose to take sides with what they perceive as the weak party. After WWII, the Jewish people was granted that role, and the Holocaust memory officially became the darker side of collective European history. But the diversity and mass immigration that followed that era, which Europe proved incapable of controlling, is now rapidly backfiring among sensitive groups who historically have tried to wipe each other out from the world map.

After the Palestinians and Israelis clashed together once more, and Israel with US backing boasted military superiority, the liberal-leftist camp immediately switched sides. Now the Jews were Nazis, and the Palestinians were the innocent victims of genocide. Liberals began painting swastikas on Israeli flags during demonstrations. Neutral Sweden provoked Israel up to a breaking point, escalating international relations.

Now Sweden faces the results. Its Jewish population is effectively fleeing the big metropol of Malmö to the Israeli homeland. The streets of Malmö are no longer safe, because rioting leftists and Muslim Arabs are ganging up to take control of the suburbs and communities. Swedish anti-Americanism and anti-Israeli sentiment have escalated into Yugoslavian-esque civil conflicts. The official establishment can no longer be trusted to understand the mechanisms of multiculturalism. And I can safely re-assert my original standpoint, which stands as firmly as ever: the European Right is truly the best and only friend of the European Jews today.

Bucharest, Romania - The day after Madonna controversially went on stage to defend Romania's minority population of Roma gypsies, the famous pop star has staged a press conference in order to apologise for her outspoken remarks, which she says have "deeply humiliated" her.

During her two-hour set, Madonna stopped the music for several minutes in order to patronise the 60,000 strong crowd. Continuing in her violent tirade, she also went on to heavily criticise Romania's traditional opinion of homosexuals, whilst wearing a 'sexed up' First World War-era German military uniform. She has now expressed "profound regret" for her comments.

The singer said: "At the time I didn't know how the crowd could be booing me for what I was saying, because helping minorities is really in fashion at the moment. Several Romanians have since come up to me to explain the situation here. Needless to say the gypsies sound really terrible, a lot like our problem with the Mexicans in the USA, but even worse if that's possible. I guess you really can't picture the impact of different minorities until you see the effects up close and personal."

She continued: "Many Romanians have suffered first-hand at the actions of the gypsies, including at the concert yesterday. I have now learnt to respect people's opinions, and will try hard not make such ignorant comments in the future."

Commenting on the Roma trouble at the concert, Bucharest's local police chief said today: "During the concert, a small wave of cheers could be heard from the rear section of the audience. It is now fully acknowledged that this was actually from the local gypsy minority, who had managed to sneak inside the concert to steal phones and wallets from the distracted spectators."

In response to the controversy, Madonna's troupe of Roma gypsy performers will now be dropped, to be replaced instead by disabled Nigerian Folk Midgets.

Alex recently reviewed a batch of Hollywood movies for their liberalist qualities. He made a passing mention to American History X, of which I would like to speak further.

The movie has some good points and some bad points. The good points are that it shows racists to mainly be a bunch of low-brow numb nuts, and that the extent of their political activism is to hilariously segregate themselves and their ideas; in reality this is quite accurate. The main bad point is that its honourable attempt at critiquing racist mindsets is terribly done.

The protagonist, who impliedly inherited his racistness from his father, seems to have a little more smarts about him and uses these to organise a skinhead movement around him. They go around shouting "took our jobs!," smashing up grocery stores and then managing to beat black people at basketball, at which point the whole illusion becomes dangerously fragile.

The main white guy gets sent to jail for something or other. Then he gets raped in the showers by some white racists and afterwards makes a non-threatening black mate. He stops being racist after this. So does his younger brother, but he gets shot by a black boy at school, which must have been a little annoying after all of his progress. Maybe he should have worn a SHARP badge or something.

So the moral of the film (I think) is that we need to parachute drop non-threatening blacks into white neighbourhoods to teach the nervous locals that ethnic people are cool too! Then we get some white guys to go around raping to show people that white people can be complete shits sometimes.

Yes, It wouldn't help to note that interaction with different people aids understanding, but when the basic premise of this film, and every other anti-racist film from Hollywood, is to try and tackle the huge and multi-faceted problem of racial tension with the lesson "make an ethnic mate" or "blame white bigotry" without even skimming the surface of ideas or different contexts, the message becomes predictably banal.